Bradezone

Archive for ‘News and Culture’

Monday, February 7th, 2011

Spangled

Well, it happened again. Someone on a grand stage forgot the lyrics to our national anthem. This time Christina Aguilera was the unfortunate victim of circumstance, but the same thing has happened many times before. These frequent flubs could be attributed merely to the laws of probability—numerous public performances of the song are bound to result in some of them missing the mark.

However, in my opinion something else is behind these troubles. Many of the song’s lyrics are so awkward and obscure that plenty of singers end up in the midst of a verbal minefield when attempting to recite them, and thus a singer can experience difficulty identifying with the words. I know I have mouthed “The Star Spangled Banner” in times past with less than supreme confidence that I was getting it right. So today I shall traverse the lyrics line by line and attempt to parse the meaning out of them. I want to know what we are up against.

O! say can you see by the dawn’s early light,
What so proudly we hailed at the twilight’s last gleaming,

Forgiving the punctuation choices in the text, the song begins with an apparent exhortation, “O say,” which is a phrase not widely used, but in today’s parlance is typically used for a casual question: “Say, did you happen to watch the game last night?” One would assume that our national anthem carries more weight than this, so we have to assume that “O say” originally signaled something of more importance.

The next few words, “can you see,” are easy enough. A question is about to be asked, and it’s apparently rhetorical, which is fine enough for a song. The next lines, “by the dawn’s early light,” are vague by themselves and seem to portend the actual question that has not yet been fully delivered. “What so proudly we hailed” finally hints at something meaningful, but the illustration still seems incomplete, and “hailed” is another word we no longer use very much. Most of us know that it means something like “esteemed” or “praised” so that’s good enough for now.

The second line ends with “at the twilight’s last gleaming,” which finally gives a hint of the complete picture. Can we see at dawn what we hailed at twilight? Again, these words are difficult to process when singing at normal speed, but dwelling on them can provide some sense of the meaning. Perhaps “hailed” means something closer to “saluted” in this case—last night we saluted something which we now see again at dawn. To be fair, let’s assume that we know the title of the song already and that we are probably saluting the “banner” in this passage. But let’s leave the “star-spangled” part for later consideration.

Whose broad stripes and bright stars through the perilous fight,
O’er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming?

The punctuation from the first two lines indicates that the initial sentence of the song is still going. At this point we have come across two prepositional phrases and a direct object in the form of a relative clause (“what so proudly we hailed”), and there is more to come. “Whose broad stripes and bright stars” contains some nifty alliteration that could feasibly make this part easier to remember, and it is now pretty clear that we are singing about the American flag. But the word “whose” is slightly jarring, because the pronoun “what” has already been used to refer to the same thing. This is a lot to sift through so far.

The next few words, “through the perilous fight,” are our first indication of why the question (which is still not complete) has been asked. Can you see the banner that apparently survived a dangerous battle?  We need more information, which the next line will hopefully provide.

“O’er the ramparts we watched” is where things start to get quite muddy, and not only because most of us are unfamiliar with ramparts, which we can probably think of as barricades. The phrase itself is extremely tough to diagram. In fact, most people could be forgiven for treating this whole line as one short sentence: “O, the ramparts we watched were so gallantly streaming.” My best guess is that the first part means something like, “over the barricades that we oversaw,” which seems to best fit the context. The remaining text, “were so gallantly streaming,” thus refers back to the previous line, so that it might mean, “whose stars and stripes were still streaming through the battle.” In this case “streaming” must mean “waving” or something similar.

Putting everything together so far, here is what I think the song is saying: “Hey, can you still see the same flag this morning that we saluted last night, despite the raging battle that took place near the barricades where we were located?” Whew… hopefully the rest of the song is not so challenging.

And the rockets’ red glare, the bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there;

“And the rockets’ red glare” is descriptive enough, although these days we probably think of a rocket more as a space-faring vessel or a fireworks component rather than a weapon. Then again, we are all familiar with rocket launchers. But did they have those back then? No time to think about it. Let’s move on.

The next phrase, “the bombs bursting in air,” is fairly straightforward, although today we don’t normally think of bombs detonating in midair. We set bombs in a fixed place first. So we can assume from this line that rockets and bombs must have meant something slightly different at the time this song was written, but we can navigate our way around these lyrics if we have not been confounded by the ramparts from before. A new sentence has begun with rockets and bombs as the subject. Now we need to know what they are doing.

“Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there” wraps up the idea satisfactorily once we take an extra moment to connect it to what has gone before. Remember when we were asked earlier whether we can still see the flag this morning? These two lines seem to answer the question affirmatively: the weapon fire from the overnight battle lit up the sky just enough to indicate that the flag was indeed at the same spot.

O! say does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave?

Now we are nearing the end of the song, and once again we are being addressed with “O say.” The final sentence begins as a question: “does that star-spangled banner yet wave?” This must be rhetorical, as we have already established that the flag did in fact survive the night. The potential confusion of this line lies in the word “spangled,” which we never use in common speech today. We can guess from the context that it means something like “adorned” or “decorated” but there may be a hint of lingering doubt in our minds.

“O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave” provides a sufficiently clear ending to the song, and completes the question from the previous line. “Is that aforementioned flag still waving over this area, which is part of a nation consisting of free and brave people?”

Our national anthem is doubtless a piece of fine poetry, but it is a poem that demands intense mental effort to understand clearly. Since this is the case, I can sympathize with those who have trouble singing the entire song without error. Interestingly enough, the United States originally used “My Country, ‘Tis of Thee” as an unofficial anthem before adopting “The Star Spangled Banner” in 1931. The switch is understandable since the first song shared its melody with the British national anthem, and we wanted something uniquely ours. I just wish we had found a way to keep the initial song’s lyrics—the sentence structure is much simpler, and the message is more evocative of our roots. These two qualities would likely produce more riveting public performances, allowing artists to demonstrate their talents and emotions with far more confidence. As it stands, most of us will prepare for each rendition of our current anthem with continual trepidation.

Thursday, March 18th, 2010

Hockey Matters

I live in the south, and I think hockey is the most exciting sport you can watch. I heavily promoted the Olympic USA/Canada matches to all my friends, and gladly the games did not disappoint. However, I think there are a few obvious reasons why people normally don’t give hockey a fair chance.

  1. Alex OvechkinThey’ve never played it. Many people follow sports they play or have played before, even if only recreationally.
  2. The scores are low. At least the NHL no longer allows ties. I celebrated the day they instituted a shoot-out. And offense is a bigger factor now than in the 90’s. Maybe if hockey used the artificial method of football and awarded 6 points per goal, people wouldn’t notice?
  3. They can’t relate as much to the players. Since most players are from other countries, a sense of connection is missing for some fans when they watch the game.

For myself, I can say that none of these three things matter. What got me into the game was NHL 94 for the Sega. I enjoyed playing that game so much, I had to find out more about the real thing. The scores might not have been 12-2 like I was used to, but I still loved certain things about the game. Here are a few reasons why hockey could catch on if promoted properly:

  1. ONE timeout per team, per game. This is a massive advantage for hockey over basketball and football. How many times have those sports slowed to a crawl simply because teams are allowed to say “Hold up!” whenever they want?
  2. It combines a bunch of things people already like: slapping a small item with a stick (baseball, golf), fighting and hitting (UFC, football), 5 on 5 goal-oriented setup with slick passing (basketball). Plus it adds the wacky element of doing it all on skates.
  3. I am firmly convinced that the NHL has the best announcers of any sport, by far. Doc Emrick and Jim Hughson are masters of their craft, and most of the teams’ local guys are fantastic as well (as I have found from subscribing to NHL Center Ice). There seems to be more passion and less detachment from all these guys compared to other sports. It’s like we’re all in on a great secret, and can’t get enough of this great sport. Here are just a few favorites.

NOTE: This post initially appeared in slightly modified form as a comment on an ESPN article by John Buccigross.

Sunday, January 24th, 2010

I’m with Coco

Conan O’Brien is an American hero. That may sound like overstatement to some, but rare is the entertainer who sees the big picture of life and inspires multitudes with a balanced commitment to humor and honesty. Those of us who love to laugh—and love to make others laugh—have our modern day patron saint. Conan’s final episode of The Tonight Show was unforgettable, and he closed in grand style with this exhortation.

Watch Conan’s farewell speech here.

Thanks for doing what you do, Conesy. Karma will always be on your side!